eSource
The planned eSource module will organize source documentation around protocol-defined visits and procedures. Configurable forms, review workflows, and controlled amendments will support consistent documentation across study teams.
Open Records
23
awaiting review
Completeness
94%
configured checks
Amendments
5
this week
Signed Off
142
approved records
Records Awaiting Review
AURORA-1 — Visit 4, Participant 014
3 entries outstanding
NEPTUNE-3 — Visit 2, Participant 007
Ready for sign-off
HELIOS-2 — Amendment v2.1
Form version updated
ORION-4 — Screening, Participant 003
1 inconsistency flagged
Illustrative concept using fictional data. Capability availability is planned.
Capabilities are grouped by operational purpose. Each is described as planned until availability is confirmed.
Develop study-specific templates for assessments, procedures, observations, and visit records. Require review and approval of templates before use, including changes resulting from protocol amendments.
Support appropriate field types, required entries, conditional sections, and recorded units. Preserve the distinction between documented findings, calculated values, and staff interpretations.
Highlight missing information and configured inconsistencies for review. Checks must not fabricate values, backdate entries, or silently alter clinical records.
Route records to designated reviewers, track open comments, and document resolution. Support configurable review responsibilities and sign-off requirements.
Preserve original entries and record subsequent changes with user attribution, timestamps, and reasons where required. Maintain form-version context for completed records.
Provide controlled access to approved records and track review questions through defined workflows.
A coordinator completes visit documentation. Configured checks identify outstanding entries, designated staff review the record, and amendments remain traceable.
A coordinator opens the protocol-defined visit template and documents findings.
Configured checks highlight missing entries and inconsistencies for review.
Designated reviewers assess the record, open comments, and document resolution.
Amendments are preserved with attribution, timestamps, and reasons where required.
Approved records are available for authorized monitoring access.
The same connected records surface differently for each role, so people see what matters to their responsibilities.
Study Coordinator
Visit templates, outstanding entries, and documentation tasks.
Principal Investigator
Assigned reviews, open comments, and sign-off requirements.
Quality Manager
Review workflows, resolution status, and amendment history.
This module connects with the others so study, document, and financial workflows stay in sync.
AI helps staff review information, prepare drafts, and organize work. Staff review every output and retain control of decisions.
Document search across source records
Visit note summaries for review
Task suggestions for outstanding source reviews
AI-generated content requires staff review. The platform must identify uncertain or missing information and must not autonomously determine eligibility, diagnose conditions, or make treatment decisions.
CTMS
Study oversight and coordination
Recruitment & Participant Engagement
Recruitment pipelines and engagement
eReg / eISF
Regulatory binders and records
Financial Management
Study budgets and financial workflows
CRM & Study Opportunities
Sponsor and CRO relationships
Reporting & Analytics
Operational and financial insight
Evoright 360 is in development. Tell us about your workflows and priorities, and our team will walk through how the platform can come together for your site or network.
Evoright 360 does not collect patient information through this form.